Biomarkers are a hotly debated topic at the moment within the cancer immunotherapy field.

At the recent Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer annual meeting (SITC 2015), there was even a debate with industry representatives arguing the “pros” and “cons.” Daniel Chen, MD PhD from Genentech (pictured right) argued “pro” and Steven Averbuch MD (pictured left) from BMS argued “con.”

SITC 2015 Biomarker Debate

The challenging question for anyone at the moment is if your Parent, Spouse or Best Friend were PD-L1 negative, would you still want them to receive a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor (presuming it was indicated for the disease) and have a chance of a response, even if their PD-L1 negativity would suggest only a slim chance of responding?

AT SITC 2015 we spoke with an industry expert who offered insights into a leading company’s biomarker strategy and what the future may look like in 5-7 years time.

Subscribers can sign-in or you can sign-up in the box below to learn more…

Posted by 

Purchase Access to Premium Content

PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU BUY. Click on blue icon to purchase a PERSONAL, INDIVIDUAL license to premium content. Please READ our TERMS OF USE before purchasing (link at bottom of page): You are NOT PERMITTED to share access or copies of posts. If you work for a CONSULTING FIRM, AGENCY, or are in PR or COMMUNICATIONS you cannot purchase an INDIVIDUAL license through this site without prior approval (even if your use is personal) and typically a CORPORATE license will be required. Please CONTACT US to discuss how you might use our content & obtain a quote for the appropriate license. Rates may change without notice and are non-refundable. If you in any doubt about whether you can buy through the blue icon, PLEASE CONTACT US first.