At the forum, Dr Sznol also led a breakout session, where he reviewed what is melanoma, the treatment of primary melanoma and management of advanced disease, as well as answering questions from the patients and patient advocates.
Often at medical meetings you hear the results of a clinical trial that is but one piece of the jigsaw, so it was interesting to hear a more comprehensive overview of the disease.
Dr Sznol kindly spoke with BSB about his vision for the future of cancer immunotherapies. This post includes excerpts from the interview along with additional commentary.
Subscribers can login to read more or you can purchase access in the box below.
The 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Twitter #ASH15) in Orlando has a bumper crop of interesting data.
ASH is one of the my favourite meetings on our conference calendar. I’ve been attending for many years, starting with when I was a commercial account manager for Hematology, Immunology, Transplantation and Oncology in the UK, then at Novartis in the US, when I was part of the team that brought Gleevec to market.
Hematologists make for an interesting group of people to talk to! They are very focused on the science behind a disease and how translational research can move the needle forward and generate better outcomes for their patients.
As part of our continuing preview of #ASH15, I’ve taken a quick look at the late-breaking abstracts that were released today. We will have more in-depth coverage after we’ve heard the data presented in the 7.30-9.30 am session on Tuesday December 8.
Subscribers can login to read more or you can sign up in the box below.
If you’re not already a subscriber, but what to know “What’s hot at ASH15?” then you should purchase access. Additional ASH previews are already planned. By the time you’ve read them, you should “hit the ground running” in Orlando.
As Warren Buffett famously said, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” I couldnt agree more. We have subscribers who just purchase our ASH coverage every year, so do “check it out“ if you haven’t done so already.
Readers may recall at the 2014 annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) we wrote about the work of Dr Marcel van den Brink (MSKCC) on how the composition of bacteria in the gut can have an impact on graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and survival post bone marrow transplant. See post: Can you reduce Graft versus Host Disease GvHD by regulating gut bacteria?
At SITC 2015, we heard from Dr Tom Gajewski (University of Chicago) who presented work from his laboratory, recently published in Science, that shows the gut microbiota can also impact the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors.
Dr Gajweski is one of the foremost cancer immunotherapy researchers in the United States. He previously spoke with BSB about his work on the STING pathway, and how the tumor microenvironment impacts checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. See post: Tom Gajewski takes the STING out of Cancer.
In his extremely busy schedule at SITC, Dr Gajewski found a few minutes to talk about his latest research and future plans.
Subscribers can login to read more or you can purchase access below.
It’s Friday 13th, a day often feared by the superstitious, but for AstraZeneca it certainly portended good news with the FDA approval of AZD9291 or osimertinib (now Tagrisso) in EGFR T790M mutation-positive lung cancer – three months ahead of the PDUFA date. Jonathan Rockoff, a reporter at the WSJ, was the first to announce it in my Twitter stream:
Tagrisso, new lung cancer drug from $AZN, is approved by @US_FDA, w/ companion diagnostic from $ROG.VX to identify EGFR resistance mutation
The FDA announcement for Tagrisso (generic name is osimertinib) can also be found here and the actual label here.
Note that it is now available under accelerated approval, based on tumor response rate and duration of response. This means that phase III confirmatory trials, including survival data will be needed for full approval.
As part of our ongoing series on the T790M niche, this is also a timely opportunity to catch up with the latest data that was presented earlier this month at the AACR-NCI-EORTC Cancer Therapeutics and Molecular Targets meeting in Boston.
A burning question in the field of cancer immunotherapy is how long do you have to give a checkpoint inhibitor for?
At the recent Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) annual meeting, new data presented by one of the leaders in the field, offered insight (from an unexpected direction) into what the answer to this question may be.
It has huge implications for cancer immunotherapy treatment and the many companies involved in this space.
To learn more, subscribers can log in or you can sign up in the box below…
That’s the $64K question we all want to know, and what’s more is gene editing necessary when it comes to creating an “off-the-shelf” T cell therapy, which instead of modifying a patient’s own T cells (autologous), uses cells from a healthy donor (allogeneic)?
We were really curious too, and sought out one of the world’s leading experts for their opinion on this very issue.
Subscribers can login to read more, along with our analysis of the potential impact of this latest news on CAR T cell therapies.
It’s been an interesting annual meeting at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) so far and not without controversy either, as the reaction to Incyte’s IDO1 data demonstrated on Friday when combined with Merck’s pembrolizumab (sse post).
Today, we heard the results from another early trial with a novel immune target. This time it was the turn of Macrogenics, a local biotech based up the road in Rockville, Maryland.
They are developing a number of monoclonal antibodies to a variety of targets, including B7-H3. After the controversial late breaker session on Friday, how did their drug fare in the hotseat here in National Harbor this morning?
To learn more, subscribers can log in or you sign up in the box below to find out what happened.
There were a couple of late breakers presented in the oral session yesterday that are worth discussing for several reasons, not least the controversy surrounding the stock action afterwards.
Dr Tara Gangadhar (U Penn) presented epacadostat, Incyte’s IDO1 inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab, Merck’s anti-PD1 inhibitor in a phase 1/2 trial with selected solid tumours.
Will combining these agents lead to better responses and outcomes than with pembrolizumab alone?
Dr Naiyer Rizvi (Moffitt) presented the combination data of AstraZeneca’s anti-PDL1 (durvalumab) plus anti-CTLA4 (tremelimumab) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Neither of these agents have yet been approved in any indication, so the only relative comparators we have here are nivolumab and pembrolizumab as single agents in NSCLC and ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic melanoma. There are no data approved for the BMS combo in lung cancer.
This review looks at both trials, in terms of the controversial data presented, and also in a broader context of the ever-changing landscape.
Subscribers can log in to learn more or you can sign up in the box below…