The Future of our (cancer research) Business
Happy New Year! No one really wants to spend too much time in the past dwelling on the negatives, what didn’t work, and in some spectacular cases, who’s to blame for it.
What we do want to know is what are the learnings from such endeavours and where are we going next.
Let’s look forward rather than backwards then and see what the Maverick’s crystal ball is showing in terms of fresh clarity and new trends we can learn from …
In today’s post I want to take a moment to look at some of the trends we can expect to see occuring in cancer research in 2017.
Subscribers can log in to read more about our insights or you can sign up via the blue button below:
This weekend, a controversy erupted at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) relating to Juno’s chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy following a series of tweets by Jonah Lomu, a keen biotech investor:
This innocuous looking tweet started a maelstrom of speculation and wild rumours that spiraled a little out of control. This was perhaps not helped by Dr Michel Sandelin being a little caught off guard after his presentation yesterday, essentially saying, ‘no comment’ and that the trials were stopped for ‘safety reasons’. Rather than calm things down, it unfortunately added fuel to the fire.
Yesterday, we spoke remotely with Dr Renier Brentjens (MSKCC) off the record and ascertained that the furore, far from being a major incident that impacts the whole field negatively, was actually a tempest in a tea cup that has been blown out of all proportion.
After his invited presentation and Dr June’s discussion in the clinical trials symposium today, Dr Brentjens agreed to answer our questions on the record to provide some detail and straight facts to put things in context to address the concerns.
To learn what Dr Brentjens had to say in this exclusive interview, sign in below – it makes for very interesting listening: