Biotech Strategy Blog

Commentary on Science, Innovation & New Products with a focus on Oncology, Hematology & Cancer Immunotherapy

Posts tagged ‘Vitamin E Cancer’

It’s been a bad week for vitamins, especially with the publication of data from the SELECT trial that showed healthy men taking 400 IU/day of Vitamin E had a 17% increased risk of prostate cancer.

However, there is some evidence in support of tocotrienols (unsaturated form of Vitamin E) having a potential role to play in anti-cancer therapy.  One paper that caught my attention was the work by Kazim Husain and colleagues from the Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute in Tampa.

Published Online First (October 4, 2011) in the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) journal, “Molecular Cancer Therapeutics” they showed that δ- tocotrienol may have potential to improve the effectiveness of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer.

In their laboratory and animal based research, the authors showed that δ-Tocotrienol:

  • “augments inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by gemcitabine”
  • “augments gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells”
  • down-regulates constitutively activated NF-κB in gemcitabine-treated pancreatic cancer cells”
  • “enhances the in vivo therapeutic effects of gemcitabine in a pancreatic tumor model in SCID nude mice”

Pancreatic cancer patients have a poor prognosis with less than <5% of patients surviving 5 years.  Current treatment revolves around the chemotherapy gemcitabine, but as the authors note in their Molecular Cancer Therapeutics paper, “tumor resistance is common.”

Various researchers are working on how to improve treatment options for pancreatic cancer.  One company I’m watching is AB Science and their phase 3 trial for masitinib.  You can read more about this on Pharma Strategy Blog and Sally Church’s excellent interview with CEO, Alain Moussy.

The work on the δ-tocotrienol form of Vitamin E shows that it may have a role to play in cancer treatment, notwithstanding the negative data that was published earlier this week in prostate cancer.

Husain and colleagues from Moffitt showed for the first time that δ-tocotrienol inhibited NF-κB activity and the expression of NF-κB regulated gene products. They note that inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB is involved in tumorigenesis, so inhibition of NF-κB may be how tocotrienols exert their anti-cancer effects.

These preclinical results are promising and show that:

“δ-tocotrienol is the most bioactive tocotrienol against human pancreatic cancer cells and provide the rationale for selecting δ-tocotrienol as the lead tocotrienol compound for further studies of the use of tocotrienols for pancreatic cancer prevention and treatment.”

A phase I clinical trial is ongoing (NCT00985777) evaluating the use of δ-tocotrienol in patients with pancreatic tumors.

While Vitamin E supplementation may yet be of benefit to healthy individuals, it could have benefit in patients with pancreatic cancer, so it will be interesting to see how this develops.

ResearchBlogging.orgHusain, K., Francois, R., Yamauchi, T., Perez, M., Sebti, S., & Malafa, M. (2011). Vitamin E  -Tocotrienol Augments the Anti-tumor Activity of Gemcitabine and Suppresses Constitutive NF- B Activation in Pancreatic Cancer Molecular Cancer Therapeutics DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0424

Vitamins on Shelf

Despite promising preclinical data suggesting that selenium and vitamin E may reduce prostate cancer risk, a randomized trial started in 2001 with over 35,000 men now suggests otherwise.

Given the prevalence of people taking vitamin supplements, these findings have important public health implications.

The results of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) reported in the October 12, 2011 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) show that dietary supplementation with Vitamin E significantly increased the risk of prostate cancer in healthy men.

Over 35,000 men were randomized into 4 groups: selenium (200 mg/d from L-selenomethionine) with matching placebo, vitamin E (400IU/d of all rac-a-tocopherol acetate) with matching placebo, both agents, or placebo.  The study was stopped in September 2008 as a result of an interim analysis that showed lack of efficacy for risk reduction and futility analysis showed a lack of future benefit.

The data in 2008 with a median follow-up of 5.5 years suggested an increased risk of prostate cancer observed with vitamin E.  That finding has now reached statistical significance in the latest analysis of the trial data, 7 years after the last patient was randomized.

Participants were healthy men at average risk of prostate cancer. They were monitored every 6 months and recommended to undergo prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) based on the standard of care in their community.  The primary end point was prostate cancer incidence resulting from routine community care.

The updated results from the SELECT trial are published in JAMA by lead author Eric Klein from the Cleveland Clinic and colleagues.  The data shows that the incidence of prostate cancer was greater in all treatment groups compared to placebo, but statistically significant only in the vitamin E group alone (P=0.008, HR: 1.17; 99% CI, 1.004-1.36).

The authors note this data means:

 “The risk of prostate cancer at 7 years of median follow-up was increased by 17% in men randomized to supplementation with vitamin E alone, a difference that started to appear about 3 years after randomization.”

Why does Vitamin E supplementation cause this increased risk? The authors in their JAMA paper make no suggestion.

The data from this trial has important implications for all men who take multivitamin supplements.  The authors note that more than 50% of all individuals over 60 take a vitamin supplement and 23% of them take a 400 IU/d or greater dose of Vitamin E, a dose that now has been shown to increase the risk of prostate cancer.

All too often we associate taking vitamins as healthy living.  The conclusion of the authors is one that we should all take note of:

“The observed 17% increase in prostate cancer incidence demonstrates the potential for seemingly innocuous yet biologically active substances such as vitamins to cause harm.”

Only by doing clinical trials such as SELECT, can we assess the true harms and benefits of unregulated over-the-counter products such as vitamins.

ResearchBlogging.orgEric A. Klein, MD, Ian M. Thompson Jr, MD, Catherine M. Tangen, DrPH, John J. Crowley, PhD, M. Scott Lucia, MD, Phyllis J. Goodman, MS, Lori M. Minasian, MD, Leslie G. Ford, MD, Howard L. Parnes, MD, J. Michael Gaziano, MD, MPH, Daniel D. Karp, MD, Michael M. Lieber, MD, Philip J. Walther, MD, PhD, Laurence Klotz, MD, J. Kellogg Parsons, MD, MHS, Joseph L. Chin, MD, Amy K. Darke, MS, Scott M. Lippman, MD, Gary E. Goodman, MD, Frank L. Meyskens Jr, MD, & Laurence H. Baker, DO (2011). Vitamin E and the Risk of Prostate Cancer, The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 306 (14), 1549-1556

2 Comments
error: Content is protected !!