Biotech Strategy Blog

Commentary on Science, Innovation & New Products with a focus on Oncology, Hematology & Immunotherapy

Posts tagged ‘SYK’

Insights on an emerging competitor landscape

It’s Thanksgiving week in the US!

It’s a short week for us here on BSB because it’s Thanksgiving on Thursday followed by Black Friday the next day.

Now to be clear, we’re not having a sale on that day or even on Cyber Monday, but since it’s my birthday tomorrow, we do have a very rare offer (now live) for interested parties.

Check out our pricing page for more details!

Not all of the best drugs are born in the USA, however, as our latest landscape review and ASH23 Preview amply illustrates.

This emerging niche may have a few surprises hidden in it, and not necessarily from the expected quarters.

Here we highlight some abstracts to watch out for in San Diego in the context of recent developments in the space.

We also explain select ones we find intriguing, highlight emerging biotechs to watch out for (and why), plus identify those which could lead to some unexpected future dog drug heaven exits…

To continue reading our latest highlights on oncology new product development including commentary and analysis BSB subscribers can log-in or you can click to access the content.

This content is restricted to subscribers

ASH20 Preview – Part 1 on small molecule developments

Pathways to success with small molecule developments

It always amuses me when people describe the small molecule space in lymphomas as ‘neat and ordered’ when in reality, it is anything but…

After all, not all patients respond initially, some cannot tolerate the side effects, and additional mutations can be acquired in response to therapy inducing acquired resistance and sometimes more aggressive disease results.

How do we go about addressing all of these issues in order to improve outcomes further?

We can certainly get a few ideas from the early stage pipelines being evaluated, as well as from the kind of combination regimens currently being developed.  What do the results show?

Then there’s a raft of quite unrelated agents which might be competitive and could usurp existing approaches should they move earlier up in the treatment paradigm.  Plenty of Pharma execs have certainly been caught out in the past not keeping their eyes on the right eight ball.

In our latest ASH20 Preview we highlight a few intriguing abstracts to watch out for at the forthcoming meeting this weekend…

To learn more from our oncology analysis and get a heads up on the latest insights and commentary pertaining to the ASH meeting — including our latest preview of the 2020 abstracts, subscribers can log-in or you can click to gain access to BSB Premium Content.

This content is restricted to subscribers

How the Leukemia Lymphoma Society plans to Beat AML

The 2016 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology with over 27, 000 attendees, a record high, was the venue for the announcement of a major new initiative by the Leukemia Lymphoma Society (LLS), called Beat AML.

It is lead by three well respected researchers in the Hematology/Oncology field:

  • Dr John Byrd (Ohio State)
  • Dr Brian Druker (OHSU)
  • Dr Ross Levine (MSK)

Beat AML is a special project at LLS, who have developed a broad collaboration with academic researchers, pharmaceutical companies, a genomic provider, and a clinical research organization:

 

Source: LLS

Initially, there will be five trial sites, which will each offer all arms of the trial. The centers are:

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ohio
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute in Oregon
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, both in Massachusetts.

Further sites and (hopefully) also other drugs from pharma companies will be added in due course, so if you’re interested in joining this project, do contact them after checking out more details here!

For our industry readers, this would be a great opportunity to get involved in an exciting and landmark study for AML, whether you are a researcher or a company with a promising drug in early development. These types of trials can help speed up drug development if a therapy graduates in a particular subset.

Here, we offer an in-depth analysis of the scientific and clinical rationale behind this important landmark study and the targets/drugs selected to date.

BSB also spoke with Dr Brian Druker, Director of the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Knight Cancer Institute in Portland, Oregon, who offers additional insights on the special project.

Subscribers can login to read more.

This content is restricted to subscribers

ASCO 2014 CLL and iNHL Preview #ASCO14

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (iNHL) have received significant attention over the last two years. More exciting new therapies than ever before – with multiple different mechanisms of action – have either recently come to market or are in development.

There is an ongoing revolution in the CLL landscape and treatment of the disease, which above all else is good news for patients! As part of our ongoing longitudinal coverage, there’s a lot to discuss and catch up on in Chicago at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

Subscribers can log-in to Read More.

This content is restricted to subscribers

Winners and Losers in CLL at American Society of Hematology

Now that the last of the 2013 cancer conference season is finally over, we’re going to run a couple of post meeting summaries this week from ASH as a few subscribers have asked for the Cliff Notes version of what was hot – or not in the context of the market.

New treatments for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) was one of the hot topics at the recent annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology in New Orleans.

Hot on the heels of Roche’s recent FDA approval for Gazyva (obinutuzumab/GA101) in CLL, other companies in the race to market including:

  • Pharmacyclics and Johnson & Johnson (ibrutinib)
  • Gilead (idelalisib, GS-9973)
  • Infinity (IPI-145)
  • AbbVie and Roche (ABT-199/GDC-0199)
  • Novartis (CTL019).

Here’s my subjective and personal assessment of the winners and losers based on the data presented:

This content is restricted to subscribers

error: Content is protected !!