One of the many challenges in the oncology space is seeing the bigger picture of how companies evolve their early stage pipelines.

For some, it’s a bit like taking a walk in the forest and not being able to see the wood from the trees – the targets chosen are rarely random, especially those involving collaborations.  There’s a reason for pursuing a given approach, particularly i it is intended to be employed in combination with an existing, approved therapy.

There are many choices out there and even those with the deepest pockets can’t have everything, so often I’m fascinated by the selections that are taken and how they might fit in.

In our latest company review, we talked to a big pharma company active in the immunotherapy niche and sought to explore the early stage agents they are developing in the context of future doublet and triplet combinations.

Why are they doing what they’re doing and how might their approach be differentiated from others?

To find out more, check out our latest expert interview, which has a few surprises in store…

To continue reading our latest discussion on oncology new product development plus commentary and analysis BSB subscribers can log-in or you can click to access the content.

This content is restricted to subscribers

Posted by